Kontribusi Kitab Al-Mu’jam Al-Mufahras Karya Arent Jan Wensinck Terhadap Ilmu Takhrijul Hadis

Authors

  • Afro' Anzali Nurizzati Arifah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Muhid Muhid UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Andris Nurita UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37348/cendekia.v9i1.218

Keywords:

Hadith, Orientalist, Science of Takhrijul Hadith

Abstract

Hadith is indeed the main source of teachings upheld by Muslims. Its existence has existed since the time of the Prophet Saw and supported the development of Islam, until finally all criticisms of the hadith of the Prophet Saw appeared after the death of the Prophet Saw. Orientalists have always been judged badly by many hadith scholars because they judge hadith only with one side, but in fact there are several orientalists who contribute to the process of developing hadith, namely the science of takhrij hadith. The development of takhrijul hadith itself developed rapidly among scholars. It's just that the initial support in this takhrij process uses one of the books of orientalist work to date. This article aims to explain orientalist views on hadith along with academic honesty and study of the book of takhrij by orientalists. This research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The result of this study is that the role of orientalists in the development of hadith and the science of takhrijul hadith is true. In fact, it is very useful for the study of subsequent hadith, in this study also saw his academic honesty in writing works about Islam, especially hadith.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, Kamaruddin. Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Hikmah, 2009.

Arifin, Tajul. Ulumul Hadits. Bandung: Gunung Djati Press, 2014.

A’zami, M. Mustafa. Dirasāt Fî Al-Hadīs al-Nabawī Wa Tārīkh Wa Tadwīnih. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-Islami, 1992.

Badawi, Abdurrahman. Ensiklopedi Tokoh Orientalis, Judul Asli : Mausu‟ah al-Mustasyriqiin, Penerjemah : Amroeni Drajat,. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2003.

Hauqola, Nur Kholis. “Otentisitas Sunnah Dan Kedudukannya Dalam Legislasi Hukum Islam.” al-Ahkam2 24,1 (2014): 57.

Huda, Sokhi. “STUDI KRITIS ATAS PEMIKIRAN WENSINCK TENTANG SUMBER DAN PERKEMBANGAN AKIDAH MUSLIM.” Menara Tebuireng 3,1 (2006): 25.

Ibrahim, Farid Wajdi. Orientalisme Dan Sikap Umat Islam. Yogyakarta: Lanarka, 2006.

Idri. “PERSPEKTIF ORIENTALIS TENTANG HADIS NABI: Telaah Kritis Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Eksistensi Dan Kehujjahannya.” Jurnal Al-Tahrir 11, 1 (2011): 201.

Iman, Fauzul. “ILMU TAKHRIJ AL-HADITS: SEJARAH DAN URGENSI.” AL-QALAM 52,X (1995): 33.

Isnaeni, Ahmad. “Pemikiran Goldziher Dan Azami Tentang Penulisan Hadis.” KALAM 6,2 (2012): 368.

Izzan, Ahmad. Studi Takhrij Hadis: Kajian Tentang Metodologi Takhrij Dan Kegiatan Penelitian Hadis. Bandung: Tafakur, 2012.

Jamilah, Maryam. Islam Dan Orientalisme, Sebuah Kajian Analitik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1997.

Karim, Abdul. “Pemikiran Orientalis Terhadap Tafsir Hadis.” Jurnal Addin 7,2 (2013): 308.

Kusnadi. “KRITIK M. MUSTAFA AL-A’ZAMI TERHADAP IGNAZ GOLDZIHER DAN A.J. WENSINCK TENTANG AUTENSITAS HADIS SEBAGAI SUMBER ISLAM.” Ulumul Syar;i 8, 2 (2019): 57.

Maya, Rahendra. KONSTRUK ILMU TAKHRĪJ AL-HADĪTS. AL MASHLAHAH JURNAL HUKUM DAN PRANATA SOSIAL ISLAM, n.d.

Muh. Iqbal, Jannatul Husna, Nurkholis. “‘Explosive Isnad and Isnad Family: Thoughts of Mustafa Azami and Nabia Abbott’” (n.d.): 74.

Muzakky, Althaf Husein. “RAGAM METODE TAKHRIJ HADIS: DARI ERA TRADISIONAL HINGGA DIGITAL.” Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara 4,1 (2022): 76.

Nirwana, Dzikri. “Diskursus Studi Hadis Dalam Wacana Islam Kontemporer.” Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 13,2 (2015): 188.

Rahman, Andi. “Pengenalan Atas Takhrij Hadis.” Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis 2,1 (2016): 157.

Rahman, Fazlur. Ikhtisar Mustholahah Hadis. II. Bandung: PT AL-MA’ARIF, 1978.

Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1987.

Schaar, Stuart. “Orientalism at the Service of Imperialism.” Race and Class 21 (1979): 70.

Setiadi, Yadi. “Kontribusi Arent Jan Wensinck Dalam Ilmu Takhrīj Hadis.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 8,2 (2019): 150.

Subakir, Ahmad. “Kritik Atas Orientalisme Dan Kecurigaan Atas Kajian Keislaman Di Dunia Barat.” Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama 4,2 (2014): 151.

Thoha Hamim. MENIMBANG KEJUJURAN AKADEMIK KAUM ORIENTALIS DALAM KAJIAN KEISLAMAN. Surabaya, n.d.

Villia, Lativa Latansa. “Sejarah Dan Perkembangan Kritik Hadits.” Jurnal Imtiyaz 1,1 (2017): 50.

Wazna, Ruhama. “METODE KONTEMPORER MENGGALI OTENTISITAS HADIS (Kajian Pemikiran Harald Motzki).” Ilmu Ushuluddin 17,2 (2018): 112.

Wensinck, Arent Jan. Al-Mu’jam al-Mufahras Li Alfāzh al-Hadīts al-Nabawī. Leiden: Brill, 1969.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-28

How to Cite

Arifah, A. A. N., Muhid, M. ., & Nurita, A. (2023). Kontribusi Kitab Al-Mu’jam Al-Mufahras Karya Arent Jan Wensinck Terhadap Ilmu Takhrijul Hadis. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 9(1), 56-76. https://doi.org/10.37348/cendekia.v9i1.218

Issue

Section

Articles